Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Just how did a handful of British manage to rule India?

1. The presence of British in India was not small

East India Company had a sizable Army in India. By 1806, they had about 154,000 armed men and far more than most armies at that time. 
undefined

By 1857 mutiny, this army more than doubled: 
By 1880, the army grew to 550,000 with a sizable addition to British troops. To provide you a context, the present Indian Army is twice that size while having to protect 4 times the population.

Besides their army in India, Company & later Britain had Navies in the Indian ocean from Malaysia, Australia to South Africa. These navies helped bolster the administration and Britain could quickly move the troops in case of trouble. The creation of railway system further strengthened the administration by easing troop movement within India. In a few decades, Mahatma would turn the same advantage against them, as he used the radio, newspapers and the railway system to connect common Indians.  

2. India was a divided nation then

After the disintegration of Mughal empire there was nothing connecting India. That means, although there were uprisings in various parts of the country, they were all random and uncoordinated. For instance, some group in Vellore would rebel. The company would send 2000 troops and they will be squashed. A month later, another group would rebel in Bombay and the company would send the 2000 men there. The chain would go on.

By brutally squashing the uncoordinated rebellion, they sent a strong message. Unless, a big chunk of India made a coordinated attack, the company could just keep sending a few thousand strong warriors to squash rebelling everywhere. 

This is where Mahatma's genius foiled British plan. Instead of the Maratis, Bengalis and Tamils attacking the British rule in a sporadic way, he made them act coordinated at the same time. When whole of India launched a coordinated attack, there was little the British army could do. He also removed the fear that was keeping the commoners chained. 

3. Help from Princely states

The British didn't rule all of India. A big chunk of them was ruled by Indian kings. These local kings were all loyal to the British (those not loyal were elminated) and actively helped squashing rebellions in the British controlled regions close to their state. For instance, the British would take Hyderabad's and Mysore's help if they need to fight a rebellion in Madras. Only the pink territories were ruled by the British and they were all adjacent to the princely states.

4. Winning the elites

Britain won over Indian elites (especially Hindu elites) and these elites helped give legitimacy to the empire. For these Indian elites, British rule was a welcome break from a long period of oppression under Islamic rule and also provided a chance to reform Indian society. From Raja Ram Mohan Roy to Dhadhabhai Naoroji (the first Asian MP in Britain) to Motilal Nehru, Indian elites of that time went along with the British rule. People like Sir Surendranath Banerjee and Netaji Bose served as Civil Servants. 

These Indian elites helped pacify the masses. Mahatma simply entered and cut the cord. Indian elites came out flocking. That pulled the legitimacy from under their feet and now they were made to look like real invaders (previously they were a part of a "reformatory" system that included the Indian elites). 

5. Indian Masses don't Revolt (unless our religion is touched)

Indians are known for extreme tolerance and we never really rebel, as long as our daily life is not impeded. This is the reason why we could be ruled by so many invaders of every stripe. The only time we revolt are when our religious practice is affected (such as in 1857 when our troops were made to touch beef/pork coated cartridges). 

This is the general pattern throughout our history. In 185 BC Pushyamitra Sunga led a coup in Maurya empire due to the imposition of Buddhism.  In 18th century AD, our kings revolted against Aurangzeb's rule when he started imposing Islam on India. Aurangzeb's religious zeal helped end the Mughal empire. Religion is the biggest unifying thing in India & it is quite easy to turn the masses with religion. 

Unlike the French, Dutch and Portuguese, British were careful not to interfere in India's religious practices.  They were smart. Thus, Indians just let them be. If you don't mess with India's religious practices, your politics is generally safe. Mahatma was quite smart in bringing religion into the freedom struggle. Without bringing religion, you cannot bring the Indian masses out. 

6. Use of existing systems & hierarchies

Britain kept existing hierarchies intact and used them effectively. Thus, the Zamindari system of Mughal time was actively utilized to collect tax from the peasants.

Indians of 18th and 19th centuries were quite closed to change. Thus, retaining the old systems meant that Indians had lesser motivations to rebel. However, if it were any other colonial power, such as the Spanish, Indians would have been hard to rule. The Spanish messed too much in the regions they ruled.

Sunday, February 23, 2014

What is India's involvement in LTTE movement?

The Sri Lankan Civil war has a complex dynamics. As a kid I lived in a region where Sri Lankan TV & Jaffna Radio was the only signal we got as Doordarshan often had poor reception. Many of the people there had very emotional relationships with Lanka. One of my 1st grade friends had a name Ravanan (his father's name was Indrajeet) and he used to say he will revenge for IPKF (happened during my kindergarten). Even as a kid he used to make small clay pellets to use with catapults that he said will use for Tamil freedom. I never understood then why he was such a lunatic. 
------------------------------------------------
Part 1: Demographics
There are three main groups here:
  1. Sinhalese - who are predominantly Buddhist or Christian. 74% of Srilankans are Sinhalese. These people are believed to have migrated from Bengal, 2500 years ago. Prince Vijaya. 
  2. Srilankan Tamils - who are predominantly Hindu. These people are there in the island, since antiquity. According to some people in TN, the Hindu character of Ravan was a Tamil. They form about 15% of the population.
  3. Indian Tamils - These are people who migrated from India during the British era to work in the plantations. They are also predominantly Hindu, although there are also sizable muslims and christians here. These are the people worst affected in the war. They form about 11% of the population.

Part 2: India and Sri Lanka in Ancient History
In 3rd century BC, Sinhalese were converted to Ashoka's Buddhism (that originated around the Bihar/Bengal region), while the Tamils have always maintained close ties with kingdoms of Tamilnadu and hence Hinduism was their main religion.

Tamil kingdoms of the south India, especially the Cholas, have always fought the Lankans and have even invaded a few times. However, Lankans were also allied with another Tamil kingdom Pandyas (the arch rivals of Cholas). Since these native Tamil kingdoms fell in about 13rd century, Tamilnadu started having less of influence over Sri Lanka. Both the Tamils and Sinhalese had a lot of genetic influence from the Indian Tamils.
Part 3: Lankan-Tamil relationships
Things were normal for centuries. When Britain took over the island in  1815 they started their own "divide-and-rule" there. They brought  communal representations for each community. 

Since the 19th century, the Srilankan Tamils became the most progressive community among three and quickly climbed the ladders of civil service and governance. Even the highest job in the colonial rule was held by a Tamil -Ponnambalam Arunachalam. By  1948, when Sri Lanka got its independence, 60% of all government jobs  were held by the Lankan Tamils who constituted less than 15% of the  population. This brought plenty of resentment among the Sinhalese who felt disenfranchised and in that year two controversial acts were passed:

  1. Ceylon Citizenship Act - Stripped the Tamils of Indian origin (who were there for generations) of their citizenship rights.
  2. Policy of standardization - Instituted policy minimums that significantly reduced the Tamil involvement in education and civil service.

Since 1950s, Sri Lankan government pushed an active form of ethnic cleansing through the Sri Lankan state sponsored colonisation schemes which effectively meant Sinhalese have to distributed in those areas that were Tamil strongholds.

Part 4: Violence grips Tamils
In 1956, Sri Lanka passed the Sinhala Only Act that effectively made Sinhalese as the official language stripping Tamil of official recognition. This was followed by a massive riot against the Tamils in 1958 when Ceylon changed its official name to the Sanskritized Sri Lanka (from Ramayana): 1958 riots in Ceylon. The riots left 200 Tamils dead.

In 1974, during the International Tamil conference at Jaffna (capital of Tamil Eelam), Sri Lankan soliders used brutal force and led to the loss of 9 lives. 1974 Tamil conference incident 

 In 1970s, Sri Lanka banned the import of magazines and periodicals from Tamilnadu. In 1981, the precious Jaffna Tamil library (one of the biggest in Asia) was burnt: Burning of Jaffna library 1981. This broke the camel's back.


Part 5: Demand for Separate Tamil Land
By 1970s, the Tamils had thrown their towel due to the events above. Two separate groups of separatists emerged:

Tamil United Liberation Front: who wanted to achieve through peaceful means.
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam: had no hesitation to use violence and force.

They started demanding a separate nation for them - Tamil Eelam (the native name for that region with the green areas below. 


In 1983 the worst of anti-Tamil pogroms happened: Black July. This was reported provoked when LTTE did its first ambush, killing 13 SL soldiers. Four Four Bravo 


Part 6: Indian involvementTraining the Tigers.
As things started to get out of hand in Lanka, India was worried. There was huge pressure from Tamilnadu parties for an intervention. Meanwhile, Sri lanka started moving towards US and Pakistan, giving Indira Gandhi hard thing to worry about national security. 

For India, these were the following considerations:
  1. Sri Lanka was aligned with the US and Pakistan. India was at that time aligned with USSR (and it is rumored at USSR's KGB had a high level of control over Indian bureaucracy: 'KGB moles infiltrated Indira's PMO'). It was at the height of cold war (early 1980s) and India had to break the US-SL nexus. LTTE proved an ideal folly for India. 
  2. The brutality of pogroms in Sri Lanka was forcing droves of refugees into India. Historically, Sri Lankan Tamils had a high level of support in Tamil Nadu and politicians including MG Ramachandran & Karunananidhi put enormous pressure on the centre. Indira Gandhi needed one of these to shore up her politics.

Thus,  India started involving herself. All over TN there were camps in 1970s  & 80s, that started training the tigers. It is rumored that these  were trained in the Arcot districts of TN where there are plenty of  forests. Indira Gandhi helped train Tamil rebels, and reaped whirlwind. India trained 5 extremist organizations using RAW:Jain Commission: Growth of Tamil militancy 
  1. PLOTE
  2. EPRLF
  3. TELO
  4. EROS
  5. LTTE

Each was given its own camps across Tamil Nadu and some even went to Libya, Syria and Lebanon to get trained. They learned the deadly tactics of suicide bombing (LTTE was the world's most advanced in this deadly skill).

In a short time, severe in-fighting among these groups emerged. In 1982, LTTE supremo Prabhakaran had a shootout his rival Uma Maheswaran in broad daylight in the middle of Chennai (Pondy Bazar). Although the police arrested him, he was released immediately on bail (presumably due to the intervention of RAW). Chennai court closes criminal charge against slain LTTE chief 

Eventually, the other organizations either got merged or got destroyed by LTTE. 

Part 7: India about-turn. IPKF
At the peak of the civil war in 1987, India dropped supplies in Jaffna: Operation Poomalai and foiled an attempt by SL army to win over the rebels.  And then on May 1987, Rajiv made an inexplicable move to cozy up with the lankans through theIndo-Sri Lanka Accord. Under the terms of that accord, India was to deploy a peace keeping mission. As though to warn that SL government is untrustworthy, an SL solider attempts assassination on Rajiv when we was in Colombo as an official guest. He is a successful politician in SL now: Vijitha Rohana 
   
That blind trust over Sri Lankans, cost India and Rajiv too dear. Just like his grandfather he labored some grand visions of neighborhood friendship only to appear foolish eventually. India was bruttally bruised in Ceylon by both the Lankans and Tamils. Indian Peace Keeping Force 

Part 8: Frankenstein turns its head
LTTE was furious at this about turn by Rajiv. But, the monster had already been set loose. Close to 10K Tamils and 1200 Indian soldiers died unnecessarily. Prabharakan was in a blind rage and ordered assassins to kill Rajiv. 

I was a kid during that time and we were spending our vacation in the island of Rameswaram (stone's throw from Lanka) when the assassination happened. It immediately set off panic throughout India. It was really scary time back then. That was the time I started reading newspapers, though too young to understand much. There were raids as India made a massive offensive against the Tigers. 
Also see: Sri Lanka profile - Timeline

Since then, the public support for the Lankan Tamils have dwindled and given that the cold war ended in late 80s, India had no need for LTTE. Indian army provided increasingly strong support to the SL army that led to the eventually destruction of Tigers in 2010.

History of India: Who are the greatest kings and warriors in Indian history?

Here are the 13 great emperors of Bharat (ancient India). I took the size of the territory won and the influence on the people & culture as the measure of the emperor's greatness. I have also included the maps of their territories. We have 9 individuals and two father-son duos (Samudragupta/Chandragupta II and Raja Raja Chola/Rajendra Chola) who formed the most powerful force fields over the nation. 

Tier I
  1. Emperor Ashoka (304 BC) -- he ruled over one of the largest territories (more than 3 million sq. km) among Indian emperors by winning over most local kings. He then had a change of heart and became a pacifist (without which he could have ruled a territory as big as Genghis Khan's). He is the reason for the spread of Buddhism outside India. He is also the the originator of many ideas that have become a part of our present culture -- including the wheel in our flag and our national emblem. Ashoka is revered not just in India, but in most parts of East & South-east Asia.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka
    undefined
  2. Raja Raja Chola & Rajendra Chola (10th century AD) - The greatest of Tamil kings and among the best of India - the father-son duo established the Tamil empire in South East Asia. They built 100+ great temples (including the Tanjore Siva temple) that are a part of UNESCO's world heritage site. Unlike other kings of Bharat, they proceeded to extend their influence beyond India and controlled the Indian ocean's trade routes.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raj... 
    undefined

    undefined
  3. Chandragupta Maurya (340 BC) -- the first Indian emperor and the grandfather of Emperor Ashoka. He unified India and brought a strong response to Greek advance into Asia. He used one of India's greatest strategists - Chanakya and devised ways to defeat his emperors through various means. Like Alexander, he started winning major battles when he was just 20, and recaptured the territories captured by the Alexander's troops east of Iran. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cha... 
    undefined
  4. Samudragupta & Chandragupta II/Vikramaditya (4th century AD of Gupta empire) -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cha... - The great Gupta king who has never lost a battle in his whole life. Samudragupta and his son Chandragupta II ushered the golden age of India. They instituted a proper currency system through his minted gold coins. Under their rule India's science & art reached its peak. 
    undefined
    Tier II
  5. Krishna Devaraya (16th century Vijayangara Empire) -- One of the greatest south Indian kings, Krishna Devaraya consolidated southern kingdoms and pushed back the Islamic advances in the south. He built great temples and is a wonderful patron of art. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kri...
  6. Akbar (16th century of Mughal empire) -- The greatest Muslim emperor Akbar ruled over much of north India and was a fair monarch who was instrumental in building a large number of Islamic monuments in the country. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akbar 
    undefined
  7. Ajatasatru (491 BC of Magadha empire) -- His name in Sanskrit means one who is feared by enemies or invincible. He ruled at the time of Buddha and Mahavira (founder of Jainsim). He started the process of Indian consolidation/empire building that was then continued by his successors. He ruled over a vast part of North & eastern India. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aja...
  8. Shivaji (17th century AD Marata Empire) -- The greatest emperor of Western India, Shivaji was a master of Guerilla warfare and presided over 100,000 soldiers at his peak. His warfare methods and a dozen battle victories are simply awe-inspiring http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shi... 
    undefined
  9. Pulikesin II (7th century AD Chalukya empire) -- Ruling from Vatapi Pulikesi is one of the most feared kings of Southern India. He was brutal and his methods were fierce. He fought with 2 of the best emperors in India - Harshavardana & Narasimhavarma I http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pul... 
    undefined
  10. Harshavardana (7th century Vardhana empire) -- Harsha was greatest emperor of Central India and consolidated much of central India after the fall of Gupta empire. He blocked the advances of Southern emperors such as Pulikesin into North India. A fair ruler who was greatly respected across India and still remembered. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Har...
    undefined

  11. Narasimhavarman I (7th century Pallava empire) -- The emperor who defeated Pulikesi and built one of the masterpieces of Indian architecture - Mahabalipuram. Apart from presiding over a great art civilization in South India, he also influenced the direction of Sri Lanka.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nar... 
    undefined
    12-Kanishka
    undefined


    Kanishka was one of the greatest rulers of the Kushan dynasty, a warrior, a patron of arts, and along with Ashoka, Harshavardhana was responsible for the spread of  Buddhism in India.  Consider this his empire extended from Central Asia( Uzbekistan)  upto Mathura in Northern India, covering large swathes of India's North and North West regions. 


    13-Ranjit Singh



    A man who had lost one eye, an arm, and yet built one of the greatest empires in India,  Maharaja Ranjit Singh, the founder of the Sikh empire.  He drove out the Durranis from Punjab,  captured Multan, Peshawar, annexed the whole pf Punjab. His kingdom extended right up to the foothills of the Sulaiman Mountains, and conquered Kasur from the fierce Pathans. His empire consisted of  undivided Punjab( extending till Multan now in Pakistan),  Jammu and Kashmir till Gilgit now in POK, North West frontier till Khyber Pass and even parts of  Western Tibet. And he had some formidable generals like Hari Singh Nalwa, Dewan Mokham Chand,  Zorawar Singh along with Europeans like Jean Francois Allard.

Economy of India: What exactly happened to the Indian Economy in 1991 in layman's terms?

1. Most countries in the world depend on the global economy for a wide variety of things. For India, we depend on West Asia for our oil, South Africa for our gold, US for our technology, South east Asia for vegetable oil etc. To buy these items from the world market, we need US dollars - the global currency of trade. The only way to earn dollars is by selling enough of our stuff in the global economy (exports). 

Since 1960s, India depended on the Soviet Union for our exports - as we failed to develop good economic relationships with the US and Western Europe. It was a good going for a while (India and the Soviets) until the proverbial sh*t started to hit the fan. In late 1980s, Soviet Union started to crack and by 1991 they were split into 15 nations (Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, etc). Now, India had a major problem because our primary buyer was in turmoil. Exports were down significantly. Dissolution of the Soviet Union

2. Meanwhile, there was this guy Saddham Hussain who had his misadventure into Kuwait in 1990. This led US to war with Iraq in early 1991. Oil fields started to burn and ships found it hard to reach Persian gulf. Iraq and Kuwait were our big suppliers of oil. The war led to destruction of our oil imports and the prices shot up substantially - doubling in a few months. Gulf War and1990 oil price shock
undefined


3. In the late 1980s India's political system was imploding. Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi was involved in a series of troubles - Bofors scandalIPKF misadventure, Shah Bano case that eventually led to his ousting in 1989. What followed were two more terrible leaders who were as unstable as they were incompetent. This had a huge effect on Indian economy that was totally forgotten in the political crisis. in 1991 this stop-gap government crashed. Until Narasimha Rao was sworn as Prime Minister in 1991, Indian economy was left in gross neglect. 

-------------------------------------
Thus, 1991 was the year of perfect storm. This triple crisis brought India on its knees. On the one end, our primary buyer is gone. On the other hand, our primary sellers were in war. In the middle, our production was effectively stopped by political crisis. We were running out of dollars to buy essential items like crude oil and food from the rest of the world. This is termed a "Balance of Payments Crisis" - meaning India was not able to balance its accounts - exports were significantly less than imports. 

Since, we didn't have many dollars, we went and begged the IMF - the pawn shop of the world. They asked us to pledge our gold reserves in return for the interim loan of $3.9 billion (a huge sum for India then) just as the neighborhood moneylenders ask for our gold when we want an emergency loan. We took 67 tons of our gold in two planes - one to London and other to Switzerland to get this assistance. India's story of the crisis

'A fiscal stimulus is needed' 
India had to physically  move the gold stock out of India, abroad. I'm informed, by very, very  reliable sources, that the van taking the gold to the airport broke  down, and there was total panic.

--------------------------------------------------------

India began its "liberalization" when Rao became our Prime Minister on 21st June 1991. Essentially it was the undoing some of the idiotic policies that Nehru and his family put in place in our country (sorry, can't resist a dig at Nehru). Licence Raj
  1. We did away with many of the import restrictions. Until 1991, we imposed a 400% customs duty on many products. Industries had to beg to get an essential ingredient imported. By 1991, the duties on many products were reduced substantially. This brought new growth in our industries.
  2. Import licensing was abolished. Until 1991, you need a license to import anything and this license was very hard to get.
  3. Government did away with the production licensing in many industries. Until 1991, you needed government's permission in what to produce and how much to produce. In one stroke, the restriction was removed in many industries. 
  4. Rao put domestic economic back on track with two stars - Montek Singh and Manmohan Singh. Huge spur was given to our local industries. Stock market rules were relaxed.
  5. Manmohan abolished "gold smuggling" (remember 1980s Bollywood movies?) in one go. He effectively allowed Indian expats to bring back 5 kilos of gold with them with no duty. Now, nobody had a reason to smuggle gold & electronics.
  6. Singh and Rao allowed foreign investors to come. Until then India was living in the paranoia of East India company. Many sectors were opened for foreign investment and collaboration. Now, companies like Coke and Nike could come in. Suddenly, Bombay Stock Exchange found a life.
  7. Government started selling some of its businesses to the private. This brought cash and new round of efficiency.

In short, liberalization in India's context meant a return of the common sense that was hard to find in our economic circles since 1947. We just removed some of the rules. there is still a long way to go.

Thursday, February 20, 2014

The Alternatives Methods for Road Construction


               The Alternatives Methods for Road Construction 


The Indian Roads Congress (IRC) released the Rural Road Specification Code, 2014, detailing how to use locally available material such as jute, coir and waste such as fly ash, plastic rubbish, paper mill sludge and construction and demolition debris in laying rural roads. IRC is a subsidiary body of the Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highways that sets design and material specifications for roads and bridges.
The need for such a code stems from the fact that rural roads are typically paved with bitumen or concrete. But use of bitumen has adverse impact on environment.
For each kilometre of traditionally constructed road, tonnes of crushed stone, gravel and sand, together called aggregates, concrete and bitumen are needed, leaving the diesel required for powering the construction equipment. This is an expensive affair, particularly for India which needs to construct more than 0.2 million kilometres of rural roads and maintain another 0.3 million km to meet its vision for providing a road to each habitation by 2025.
Role of Road in Rural Economy
“Rural roads help farmers transport agricultural produce to local markets and provide easy access to educational, healthcare and financial institutions. They are crucial in strengthening local economy and improving the quality of life of those who live in villages. As state governments are responsible for laying rural roads, their abysmal performance prompted the Centre to launch the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) in 2000 for all weather road network in rural area. MoRD implements the programme as part of its initiative to connect rural India with roads.
Use of aggregates and bitumen can do irreparable damage to the environment. Both bitumen and aggregates are non-renewable minerals. And mining of sand, gravel and crushed stone remains largely unchecked. They are the most mined minerals in the country and constant head-ache of MoEF.
Alternative Methods of Road Construction
Spread jute and coir, make roads stronger
Road Made of Coir

10% cheaper than conventional roads; lasts 6-7 years
Every soil has a different capacity to withstand the load of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Engineers use different technologies to reinforce soil’s load-bearing capacity. Typically, engineers strip the topsoil, pave the track with layers of aggregate as per traffic load, and seal it with bitumen. But all roads need not have high load-bearing capacity. In rural roads a thin layer of aggregates covered with geo-textiles—woven fabrics, such as jute and coir mats, that are used to strengthen the soil—serve just right.
In 1934, jute was reportedly used to make the Strand Road in Kolkata. “But the trials were not followed up and the potential of jute in road construction remained unexplored for long..
Jute geotextile serves another purpose of PMGSY: strengthening rural economy. According to the National Jute Board, more than 4.5 million people depend on the jute sector for a living. “Larger use of jute geotextile would help retain this large work force. “There are jute mills in West Bengal, Assam, Bihar, Tripura and Andhra Pradesh. All of eastern and north-eastern states, Madhya Pradesh and a good part of the southern states can easily procure jute geotextile from these mills for paving their rural roads.
Rural roads in coastal areas can be built using another geotextile—coir mats. Use of coir in paving rural roads can generate 10,000 employment opportunities in cottage industries.
As an added advantage, the lifespan of roads increases by three to four years. This cuts down the maintenance cost.
How about a plastic road?

Plastic Road

10-18% cheaper; lasts 15 years
The idea lies in exploiting the texture and water-resistant nature of plastic to construct roads. First, plastic wastes are segregated, cleaned and shredded to the size of 2-4 mm. It is then heated and coated over gravel. The laminated gravel is then mixed with bitumen to lay roads.
The technology significantly increases the strength and life span of roads as compared to conventional bitumen roads. “The reduced consumption of bitumen makes plastic roads cheaper, but they prove to be further cheaper, say by 10-18 per cent, in the long run as they do not require maintenance for at least 15 years. Besides, the technology provides a way to dispose of non-degradable plastic waste. One kilometre plastic road can consume one tonne of plastic waste. On an average, each individual in the country uses seven kg of plastic carry bags a year.
Use fly ash in road, save soil and cement
20% cheaper; lasts 6-7 years
Fly ash, a waste produced by thermal power plants, can be used in place of soil to construct roads. This would help save 20-30 million tonnes of fertile top soil used in widening roads and raising its levels every year.
Besides, ash ponds created to dump fly ash occupy thousands of hectares and contaminate the top soil. These ponds also host stagnant rainwater and wastewater, leading to serious health problems among people living in the vicinity.
 Fly ash can be used as a soil stabiliser. It acquires the property of cement after it is mixed with lime. The technology also increases the life span of roads by about 15 years.

Roads made from demolition waste
10-15% cheaper; lasts 5-6 years
Developed countries, including the US, the UK, France and Japan, use waste materials generated during construction, renovation and demolition of buildings as aggregates in laying roads. “These wastes are a mix of concrete, tiles, bricks and other construction materials and can be partially used as replacement of 35 per cent of aggregates in laying rural roads.
Recycling and re-utilisation is an important strategy for management of such waste. This would also help reduce the demand-supply gap for aggregates, conserving depleting resources.
Use cold-mix technology, lay roads round the year
10% cheaper; lasts 5-6 years
As the name suggests, cold-mix technology does not involve heating the bitumen. Instead, it uses bitumen emulsions, prepared by mixing bitumen with water. The slurry is then poured over the aggregates.

The biggest advantage of the cold mix technology is that it helps save precious diesel, used in heating bitumen while laying conventional roads. “On an average, this technology helps save about 1,500 litres of diesel per km. It also aids faster black-topping of roads. Besides, unlike conventional roads, which are built only during the summer months, bitumen emulsion can be applied over damp aggregates and can be used to build roads around the year. This type of road is particularly suitable for north-eastern India that receives spells of rain over a longer period. Assam has constructed nearly 1,700 km of rural road in the past two years by using bitumen emulsion.